Minor Curiosities
I
tentatively offer for your delectation a few slightly more unusual Minor
methods for the Meeting at Hoole on Thursday 6th November.
They are not to be taken too seriously:
a bit of harmless fun, just for a change.
All should be within the capabilities of ringers who can ring, say,
1.
A principle
You might well say there is only one principle worth
ringing, and it is not for an even number of bells.
I would tend to agree.
The enduring popularity of Stedman reinforces that view.
Even other principles on odd numbers –
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
Single
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
I’m
sure you can complete the plain course; but to save you puzzling it out
please refer to the other attachment to my e-mail.
Alternatively go to http://methods.ringing.org
and you can find it – and, indeed, any method – there.
2.
An
There are more treble hunts than just Plain or Treble Bob (or Treble Dodging
as we must call it now). I remember seeing a peal of Minor once in the
Ringing World which had 25 different treble hunts.
(No sinecure for the treble ringer there!)
Alliance Methods were once very popular with Minor bands who wanted
to increase the number of different methods in an extent.
The 1961 Collection of Minor Methods (‘the book’) has two
types of Alliance Methods. This
one differs from Plain merely in the dodges in 5-6.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
Essentially
3.
A method – not a bob lead of another one – with 4ths at the end of the lead
Yes,
they do exist. However, some of
the old methods that can be seen on peal boards are really bob leads of
other methods. A good example is
Merchants’ Return: the plain
lead is a bobbed lead of Woodbine.
Like Woodbine itself it was once a standard part of the Minor
repertoire.
The
method below, however, can be rung only with fourths place at the lead head.
You will notice that the work above the treble is a bob lead of
Anston TB
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
You
may know that
4.
A Slow Course method
Nothing too curious so far, but now we are getting a bit weird.
The method is not really up to much, but this is it.
It will be seen that the 2 and 4 lead and make 2nds until the treble
comes back; the other bells then make 3rds and back.
The work above treble is Plain Bob.
It has conventional calls, and extents can easily be produced without
too many bobs, and with just two singles.
What makes it a Slow Course method is the fact that the 2nd,
in the plain course, does the same work for each lead.
Maplin Slow
Course
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
5.
A twin-hunt method
If
the last method is just about tolerable and possibly worth ringing – once or
twice (perhaps even a 720) – for its curiosity value, then this one is much
more appropriate for the dustbin.
It was first rung in a peal earlier this year, but it is simply a
Doubles method transferred to Minor.
Grandsire Minor has been known for a long time – and was surprisingly
popular at one time. This is
just a variation. Perhaps it can
be rung once. That’s enough.
Essentially rubbish. (But
you might like it.)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
6.
A Little Surprise method
Now,
as you know, Little methods are not at all unknown.
We have all rung Little Bob, and most ringers will have rung Spliced
Plain and Little. However, other
Little methods are far less common. At a more advanced level and on higher
numbers Little Surprise methods are rung quite frequently.
Littleport Little Surprise Royal is one example.
Little Surprise Minor on the other hand is somewhat esoteric.
To get an extent other hunt bells besides the treble need to be used,
and to call (and ring) a 720 would need a fair amount of concentration.
I actually thought of introducing variable hunt, but thought better
of it. Something for Minor
Curiosities Part II. Anyhow here
is one method which might be worth a go.
Endless dodging in 5-6 I’m afraid. (Horrendous when a bob is called.)
I suppose it is technically a Surprise method (although why not
Delight?). It is sort of Little
Woodbine. It is unnamed, and
perhaps we should leave it to its anonymity.
Dog-end S. Minor??
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
7.
A common method reversed
In
the middle of the 19th century one
Navigation TB
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
But
it’s really Reverse Oxford TB.
You recognised that straightway, of course.
Still I reckon this one will be a bit tricky to ring; it is only here
because of the challenge of ringing it.
It is actually a regular method, but – for me – those 5-6 places away
from the treble condemn it. I
really hate those. I can easily
put up with irregular methods (like Morning Exercise, for instance), but 5ths
place apart from under the treble is very ugly, in my book anyhow.
After all there are 147 Treble Dodging methods and 30 Plain methods
in ‘the book’. We don’t really
need to worry too much about the curiosities.
I
must acknowledge a handy little book by
JDA
Tuesday, 28 October 2008
Return to Chester Branch website
www.cdg-chester-branch.org.uk
I